Jekyll vs Simply Static

Compare Jekyll vs Simply Static and explore which static site generator is for you.
Both are popular solutions for running static sites, let’s see how they differ.

Why Choose Simply Static, the Jekyll Alternative

Avoid complicated instructions, markdown, and frameworks.
See why over 40,000+ users choose the easier-to-use Simply Static over Jekyll for their static website.

Simply Static vs Jekyll Features

Simply Static and Jekyll both allow you to create a static website, but they work differently.

Jekyll creates a static website using markdown text and layouts.
It then deploys the site using GitHub Pages.

Simply Static allows you to create your website in WordPress and then make it static with a click of a button. This way, you can keep WordPress as your CMS (content management system) but get all the benefits of a static website.

Here’s how they compare in a little more detail:

FeaturesSimply StaticJekyll
Manage ContentWordPressMarkdown
Can run locally (on your computer)✅ (with LocalWP)
Includes Hosting
Deployment methodsZIP, local directory, GitHub (GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify..), Amazon AWSAWS S3, BunnyCDN, or via SFTPGitHub Pages (more available via extensions)
No-Code❌ (CLI required)
Easy updates✅ (Single-, Build- and Incremental Exports)❌ (Only full exports)
Free version available
Comments integration
Forms Integration
Search Integration
Multilingual support
Optimized Output (Minification, Images, cleanup code)
Premium support from the developers❌ (only community forum)

Join the 40,000+ Using the Simply Static Plugin to Make WordPress Static


I ended up converting one WordPress site to static and it was super simple. I had one question about GitHub access that was answered quickly.

Dan Holloran


Extremely well written with top-notch support. This plugin is simplistic yet very complex under the hood yet it works just perfectly. […]

Sandy Baguskas


This is a great addition to allow a site to be hosted in S3/Cloudfront and have no more issues with wordpress getting attacked.

Kevin Withnall


WordPress is very useful but has too insecure, unreliable and slow to be used by critical sites without a solution like this. […]

Jocelyn Earl


I was having a lot of issues with malwares, but in the end it led me to this static solution for WordPress sites and I’m really enjoying this new approach of developing WordPress projects in a fast and secure way

Andre Esteves Perrone


Publishing a Jamstack site from WordPress gives the best of both worlds – content creation that’s flexible with a serverless website (we publish to S3).

Douglas Stein