HardyPress vs Simply Static

Compare HardyPress vs Simply Static and explore which headless WordPress static site generator is for you.
Both are popular solutions for running static sites, let’s see how they differ.

Why Choose Simply Static, the HardyPress Alternative

Don’t settle for huge monthly fees for your static WordPress site.
See why over 40,000+ users choose the easier-to-use Simply Static over HardyPress for their static website.

Simply Static vs HardyPress Features

Simply Static and HardyPress both create static WordPress websites from your existing dynamic WordPress website.

They do this while keeping your WordPress installation. This way, you can use WordPress as a headless CMS, but users will see a static version of your website.

HardyPress comes with WordPress hosting for your site. They use Amazon AWS for this, linking to a CDN to speed things up.

Simply Static gives you the freedom to pick your own hosting provider, deployment options, and CDN, saving you future headaches and long-term costs.

Here’s how they compare in a little more detail:

FeaturesSimply StaticHardyPress
Manage ContentWordPressWordPress
Can run locally (on your computer)✅ (with LocalWP)
Includes Hosting
Deployment methodsZIP, local directory, GitHub (GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify..), Amazon AWS S3, BunnyCDN, or via SFTPAWS S3
Easy updates✅ (Single-, Build- and Incremental Exports)❌ Only full exports
Free version available
Comments integration
Forms integration
Search integrationFuse.js and Algolia✅ Google Custom Search Engine
Multilingual support
Optimized Output (Minification, Images, cleanup code)
Premium support from the developers❌ Unclear if there is still support available

Join the 40,000+ Using the Simply Static Plugin to Make WordPress Static


I ended up converting one WordPress site to static and it was super simple. I had one question about GitHub access that was answered quickly.

Dan Holloran


Extremely well written with top-notch support. This plugin is simplistic yet very complex under the hood yet it works just perfectly. […]

Sandy Baguskas


This is a great addition to allow a site to be hosted in S3/Cloudfront and have no more issues with wordpress getting attacked.

Kevin Withnall


WordPress is very useful but has too insecure, unreliable and slow to be used by critical sites without a solution like this. […]

Jocelyn Earl


I was having a lot of issues with malwares, but in the end it led me to this static solution for WordPress sites and I’m really enjoying this new approach of developing WordPress projects in a fast and secure way

Andre Esteves Perrone


Publishing a Jamstack site from WordPress gives the best of both worlds – content creation that’s flexible with a serverless website (we publish to S3).

Douglas Stein