---
title: "Jekyll vs Simply Static: The Jekyll Alternative"
description: "Compare Jekyll vs Simply Static and explore which static site generator is for you."
date: "2024-05-29T12:23:11+02:00"
language: "en-US"
canonical_url: "https://simplystatic.com/comparison/jekyll-vs-simply-static/"
source_url: "https://simplystatic.com/comparison/jekyll-vs-simply-static/"
content_type: "text/markdown"
---

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 1](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ss-bg-wave-scaled.jpg)

# Jekyll vs Simply Static

Compare Jekyll vs Simply Static and explore which **static site generator** is for you.
Both are popular solutions for running **static sites**, let’s see how they differ.

## Why Choose Simply Static, the Jekyll Alternative

Avoid complicated instructions, markdown, and frameworks.
See why over 40,000+ users choose the easier-to-use Simply Static over Jekyll for their static website.

[Get Simply Static](https://simplystatic.com/pricing/)

## Simply Static vs Jekyll Features

**Simply Static** and **Jekyll** both allow you to create a static website, but they work differently.

**Jekyll** creates a static website using **markdown** text and layouts.
It then deploys the site using **GitHub Pages**.

**Simply Static** allows you to create your website in **WordPress** and then make it static with a click of a button. This way, you can keep WordPress as your CMS (content management system) but get all the benefits of a **static website**.

[Get Simply Static](https://simplystatic.com/pricing/)

Features

Jekyll

Simply Static

Pricing

free

$129 / year

Can run locally (on your computer)

Includes WordPress Hosting

Requires [Simply Static Studio](https://simplystatic.com/simply-static-studio/)

Free version available

Extendable

WP-CLI support

No-Code

Deployment methods

GitHub Pages (more available via extensions)

ZIP, local directory, GitHub (GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify..), Amazon AWS S3, BunnyCDN, SFTP, or Static Studio

Search integration

Forms & Comments integration

Multilingual support

Incremental static site updates

One-Click Basic Auth

Minification

Hide WordPress

Image Optimization

Premium Support

## Hear from our happy Simply Static users

We helped thousands of people switch to Static WordPress. Read about their experience with us:

★★★★★

I was having many issues with malware, but it ultimately led me to this static solution for WordPress sites, and I’m enjoying this new approach to developing WordPress projects quickly and securely.

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 2](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/andre-esteves-perrones-150x150.jpg)

**Andre Esteves Perrone**

Developer & Instructor

★★★★★

I ended up converting one WordPress site to static, and it was super simple. I had one question about GitHub access, which was answered quickly.

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 3](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/dan-holloran-150x150.jpeg)

**Dan Holloran**

Full-Stack-Developer

★★★★★

This is a great addition, as it allows a site to be hosted in S3/Cloudfront and prevents WordPress attacks.

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 4](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/kevin-withnall-150x150.jpeg)

**Kevin Withnall**

CTO

**★★★★★**

[…] Simply Static is a comprehensive solution for anyone looking to improve their WordPress site’s performance, security, and cost-effectiveness. With the bonus of outstanding support from Patrick, it’s a must-have for any WordPress user. Highly recommended! 

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 5](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/maarten-emmerick-150x150.jpeg)

**Maarten Emmerink**

Founder & CEO

**★★★★★**

Publishing a Jamstack site from WordPress gives the best of both worlds—flexible content creation with a serverless website (we publish to S3).

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 6](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Doug-headshot-Medium-150x150.jpeg)

**Douglas Stein**

Director of Engineering

**★★★★★**

WordPress is very useful but too insecure, unreliable, and slow to be used by critical sites without a solution like this. This way, we get the benefits of WordPress without the downsides.

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 7](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/joss__460x427-150x150.webp)

**Jocelyn Earl**

CTO

★★★★★

As an agency, we work with many customers who come to us with either existing WordPress sites or new sites that are perfect candidates for static sites. Supporting static sites is a lighter lift on the agency site, and the customer wins on better security and typically better performance […].

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 8](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/him-hankis-cb-150x150.jpg)

**Jim Hankins**

Founder & CEO

**★★★★★**

Static sites have many benefits. The pro version has a good feature for a solid implementation. I’ve encountered a few edge cases, and their support has been prompt and professional.

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 9](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/scott-green-150x150.jpg)

**Scott Green**

Founder & CEO

**★★★★★**

The plugin setup was easy and works great out of the box. The documentation is good, and support is great if needed, too!

![Jekyll vs Simply Static 10](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Herbert-2023.avif)

**Herbert Hoekstra**

WordPress Developer