--- title: "Hugo vs Simply Static: The Hugo Static Site Alternative" description: "Compare Hugo Static Site vs Simply Static and explore which static site generator is for you." date: "2024-05-29T14:00:00+02:00" language: "en-US" canonical_url: "https://simplystatic.com/comparison/hugo-vs-simply-static/" source_url: "https://simplystatic.com/comparison/hugo-vs-simply-static/" content_type: "text/markdown" --- ![Hugo vs Simply Static 1](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/ss-bg-wave-scaled.jpg) # Hugo vs Simply Static Compare[ ](https://jekyllrb.com/)Hugo vs Simply Static and explore which **static site generator** is for you. Both are popular solutions for running **static sites**, let’s see how they differ. ## Why Choose Simply Static, the Hugo Alternative Avoid complicated instructions, markdown, and frameworks. See why over 40,000+ users choose the easier-to-use Simply Static over Hugo for their static website. [Get Simply Static](https://simplystatic.com/pricing/) ## Simply Static vs Hugo Features Simply Static and Hugo both allow you to create a **static website**, but they work differently. Using **Hugo**, you’ll create a new site and add content using the **command line and markdown**. It’s a complicated process that requires you to be knowledgeable in creating layouts, templates, and static content in markdown files. When using Hugo, you’re also restricted by the look and feel of your finished static website. Hugo has a range of **templates/Hugo themes** you can use and customize, but it lacks the user-friendly nature of, for example, WordPress. **Simply Static** allows you to create your website in WordPress and then make it static with a click of a button. This way, you can keep WordPress as your CMS (content management system) but get all the benefits of a **static website**. It’s as easy as that. [Get Simply Static](https://simplystatic.com/pricing/) Features Hugo Simply Static Pricing free $129 / year Can run locally (on your computer) Includes WordPress Hosting Requires [Simply Static Studio](https://simplystatic.com/simply-static-studio/) Free version available Extendable WP-CLI support No-Code Deployment methods GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify, and Amazon AWS S3 ZIP, local directory, GitHub (GitHub Pages, Cloudflare Pages, Netlify..), Amazon AWS S3, BunnyCDN, SFTP or Static Studio Search integration Forms & Comments integration Multilingual support Incremental static site updates One-Click Basic Auth Minification Hide WordPress Image Optimization Premium Support ## Hear from our happy Simply Static users We helped thousands of people switch to Static WordPress. Read about their experience with us: ★★★★★ I was having many issues with malware, but it ultimately led me to this static solution for WordPress sites, and I’m enjoying this new approach to developing WordPress projects quickly and securely. ![Hugo vs Simply Static 2](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/andre-esteves-perrones-150x150.jpg) **Andre Esteves Perrone** Developer & Instructor ★★★★★ I ended up converting one WordPress site to static, and it was super simple. I had one question about GitHub access, which was answered quickly. ![Hugo vs Simply Static 3](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/dan-holloran-150x150.jpeg) **Dan Holloran** Full-Stack-Developer ★★★★★ This is a great addition, as it allows a site to be hosted in S3/Cloudfront and prevents WordPress attacks. ![Hugo vs Simply Static 4](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/kevin-withnall-150x150.jpeg) **Kevin Withnall** CTO **★★★★★** […] Simply Static is a comprehensive solution for anyone looking to improve their WordPress site’s performance, security, and cost-effectiveness. With the bonus of outstanding support from Patrick, it’s a must-have for any WordPress user. Highly recommended!  ![Hugo vs Simply Static 5](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/maarten-emmerick-150x150.jpeg) **Maarten Emmerink** Founder & CEO **★★★★★** Publishing a Jamstack site from WordPress gives the best of both worlds—flexible content creation with a serverless website (we publish to S3). ![Hugo vs Simply Static 6](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Doug-headshot-Medium-150x150.jpeg) **Douglas Stein** Director of Engineering **★★★★★** WordPress is very useful but too insecure, unreliable, and slow to be used by critical sites without a solution like this. This way, we get the benefits of WordPress without the downsides. ![Hugo vs Simply Static 7](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/joss__460x427-150x150.webp) **Jocelyn Earl** CTO ★★★★★ As an agency, we work with many customers who come to us with either existing WordPress sites or new sites that are perfect candidates for static sites. Supporting static sites is a lighter lift on the agency site, and the customer wins on better security and typically better performance […]. ![Hugo vs Simply Static 8](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/him-hankis-cb-150x150.jpg) **Jim Hankins** Founder & CEO **★★★★★** Static sites have many benefits. The pro version has a good feature for a solid implementation. I’ve encountered a few edge cases, and their support has been prompt and professional. ![Hugo vs Simply Static 9](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/scott-green-150x150.jpg) **Scott Green** Founder & CEO **★★★★★** The plugin setup was easy and works great out of the box. The documentation is good, and support is great if needed, too! ![Hugo vs Simply Static 10](https://simplystatic.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/08/Herbert-2023.avif) **Herbert Hoekstra** WordPress Developer